• Aatube
    link
    fedilink
    -252 months ago

    Only if the appointees are bad (which, since it’s Trump and “stuff up the deep state” project 2025, there’s probably a lot of bad appointees). If we obstruct appointees that are good, we’ll just keep seeing the pendulum swinging when a new party comes into power.

    • SmokeInFog
      link
      fedilink
      English
      402 months ago

      I don’t believe you’re making that argument in good faith. Every one of his nominees have been ridiculous caricatures of stereotypical MAGA car salesman

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        -32 months ago

        IIRC he had like two or so with good credentials. The one replacing Lina Khan I think was surprisingly good.

      • Aatube
        link
        fedilink
        -72 months ago

        There’s more appointees than Trump’s cabinet, which I agree is bad. There’s for example district court judges.

    • @ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      None of Trump’s appointees are good. If they were, they would refuse to serve under him.

      • Aatube
        link
        fedilink
        -52 months ago

        Appointed federal judges do not have obligations to Trump and may strike down his orders.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Sure bud. It’s not like they didn’t block Biden’s stuff and rubber stamped Trump’s stuff.

          • Aatube
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            I do not think that is enough reasoning for claiming they’re incompetent for blocking their nominations. The Supreme Court has 2 or 3 problem justices, yes, but just look at the plethora of court cases against Trump with injunctions right now. Quite a bit of them were speedily decided under Trump appointees.